Sector
Why grant managers leave.
Published June 19, 2026 · Reading time ~9 minutes
We named this whole product after the experience of watching a fundraiser sit in a small unlocked shelter at the end of their day, holding seven tools and looking exhausted. We didn't set out to build a SaaS. We set out to do something about the churn we kept watching at the orgs we worked with. This piece is what we've learned about why it happens — and the four things that actually help.
The Association of Fundraising Professionals has published surveys showing the average tenure of a fundraising staff member is under two years; Penelope Burk's long-running research has put the figure closer to 16 months at smaller orgs. We won't pretend to know the exact number; what we can say is that every small nonprofit operations conversation we've had this year has included the sentence “we just lost our grant manager.”
Five reasons that keep coming up
We've had about 60 conversations this year with small-nonprofit grant staff who left or were thinking about leaving. The reasons cluster into five, in rough order of how often they come up.
1. Tool sprawl exhaustion
The work is hard. The work being scattered across seven tools makes it heroic. Email here, spreadsheet there, Google Doc for the LOI, separate spreadsheet for stewardship, project board for tasks, calendar for deadlines, shared drive for attachments. Every Monday morning someone has to reassemble the picture from fragments. The cognitive tax of that reassembly is the part nobody puts on a job description, but it's also the part that quietly eats the day.
When we ask people what made them leave, “I was tired” is the most common honest answer. They don't mean tired of grants. They mean tired of the seam between tools.
2. Nothing to hand off to
The second-most-common reason is grief, not anger. People want to leave well. They want to write up the funder relationships they built, document the cultivation patterns that worked, name the program officers who became allies. The tools don't hold that kind of knowledge — they hold dates and amounts and statuses. So the leaving person ends up writing a 14-page Google Doc they know nobody will read in three months, and that quiet failure compounds.
This is the failure mode we built the funder profile view to fix. The relationship context that lives in a fundraiser's head is the thing the next person needs most and the thing they'll have hardest access to. We treat it as first-class data.
3. Targets without context
A board sets a $750K target for the development director without knowing whether $750K is realistic for that org's funder universe. The fundraiser misses it, the board reads “underperformance,” and the fundraiser leaves for a place where the target is set by someone who's done the job. We've heard this story enough times that we're considering building target-setting tooling, but the deeper problem is governance: most boards don't know what they're asking for.
4. Compensation
The honest one. Fundraising staff at small nonprofits are underpaid relative to comparable roles in private-sector business development. The 15% pay differential to a corporate fundraising or sales role is real, persistent, and compounding. People leave because their friends in for-profit roles are making 25% more for less stress.
Software doesn't fix this. We're not going to pretend it does. We can tell you that the most productive fundraisers we know are at orgs that paid above market rate andbought tools that let them do the job. Doing one without the other doesn't work.
5. Lack of professional development
The slow one. Fundraisers want to get better at their craft. Small orgs often don't budget for an AFP conference, a CFRE certification course, or a peer cohort. People stay where they're growing; they leave when they're plateauing. The orgs that retain fundraisers longest tend to be the ones that funded one $500 conference a year and built in time for a quarterly skill-development hour.
What doesn't actually help
A few things boards and EDs reach for that don't move the needle on retention, in our experience:
- Title inflation.Naming a junior fundraiser “Director of Development” without changing the work or the comp creates expectations the role can't meet. People feel undermined faster than they feel honored.
- Pep talks at the all-hands.“You're the engine of our mission” lands differently when delivered in a meeting about budget cuts.
- Better-positioned tool that adds another login.A new platform that doesn't replace existing tools is now the eighth tool, and the seam problem just got worse.
- “Just batch your work better.”The work isn't arriving in batches. It's arriving as interruptions because the rest of the org assumes the fundraiser is the deadline-keeper.
Four things that do help
1. Consolidate the tool stack
Not because the right tool is magic, but because the seam between tools is where the day goes. Pick one workspace that holds the grant, the tasks attached to it, the funder relationship behind it, and the post-award reporting that follows. Pay for the things adjacent to it — CRM, accounting, email — but stop trying to make them work together with workarounds.
We've written about the eight-category stack and where to consolidate.
2. Capture relationship context as it happens
Not in a Google Doc the next person won't open. In the tool, against the funder, in 30-second contact-log entries. We've seen orgs cut grant manager onboarding from three months to three weeks just because the prior fundraiser had been logging touches faithfully for two years.
This is the longest-leverage change in this whole list. Make the logging frictionless or it doesn't happen.
3. Set targets with the person doing the work
The director who set last year's targets sits down with the fundraiser at planning time and looks at the actual pipeline — funder by funder, renewal probability, new prospect pool. The target lands at a number both people believe. When it's missed, the conversation is about funders, not failure.
4. Fund one piece of growth a year
AFP membership ($250). One conference ($500–$1,500). One certification cohort. The cost is trivial against the cost of replacing the fundraiser, which industry estimates put around three times the role's salary by the time you count the lost institutional knowledge.
Where Bothy fits
We're not the whole answer. We're one piece of it — the workspace layer. We can't pay your fundraiser more, set realistic targets, or sign them up for AFP. We can take the seven-tool problem off the table, capture the relationship context they've been building so it survives them, and stop being a thing on the “reasons I'm exhausted” list.
The whole product is named after a Scottish hill shelter — a small unlocked structure where someone can sit out a storm. We chose that frame because it's how we want a grant manager to feel about the workspace they work in: a place to rest the work, not a place that adds to it.
If retention is the conversation
Talk to us about the workspace layer.
We'll show you how Bothy holds the relationship knowledge that walks out the door when a grant manager leaves. Free 30-minute conversation — no obligation to switch tools.
Read more
- The small nonprofit fund development stack →
The eight categories, what to keep, what to drop.
- Why we built Bothy →
The narrative behind the product.
- Our principles →
Five working rules we hold ourselves to. Public so customers can hold us to them.