Skip to content

GrantHub orphan?We'll migrate you free.

Guide

Honest comparison

Bothy vs. GrantHub

If you're here, you probably already know: GrantHub by Foundant sunset on January 31, 2026. Months later, plenty of orgs are still working from whatever CSV they exported in time. This is the side-by-side we'd want if we were in your seat — including the places where GrantHub was honestly better.

Last updated May 21, 2026 · Reading time ~7 minutes

The deadline has passed

GrantHub was discontinued on January 31, 2026. Since then, the platform has been unavailable. If your team migrated before then, you're probably comparing options now. If you didn't, you're working from whatever CSV export you took — or rebuilding from notes. Either way, we can help.

Foundant concentrated on the grantmaker (funder) side of the market. The grantseeker side — that was you — got retired. Foundant's announcement

The TL;DR

Feature-by-feature

Best-effort comparison based on GrantHub's public documentation and our customers' reports. = does it well, = does it with caveats, = doesn't do it.

  • Status

    GHSunset Jan 31, 2026BothyActive, accepting customers
  • Starting price

    GH$59 – $129/mo (historical)Bothy$99/mo (Solo)
  • Grant pipeline tracking

    GHYesBothyYes — scoring + drag-drop stages
  • Funder profile (aggregated view per funder)

    GHLimitedBothyYes — full per-funder history
  • Stewardship task management

    GHNoBothyYes — including AI stewardship plans you can save as tasks
  • Funder contact log (past touches)

    GHWorkarounds via notesBothyYes — first-class feature
  • Reporting tracker (post-award)

    GHLimited — date + file + statusBothyReporting workspace — timeline + 24-component checklist + role owners
  • Board-ready report

    GHBasic reporting + exportsBothyOne-click board packet — health tiles, pipeline by stage, deadlines, editable commentary, print-ready
  • Award-letter requirements ingestion

    GHNo — award PDF sits in storageBothyYes — guided structured form generates timeline + checklist
  • Renewal cultivation arc on submission

    GHNoBothyYes — thank-you, site visit, mid-cycle touch, renewal LOI auto-created
  • Email deadline reminders

    GHYesBothyYes — 7/3/1 day cadence
  • Calendar (ICS) export

    GHYesBothyYes — deadlines + tasks + reports
  • Built-in funder database

    GHNoBothyNo — curated research instead
  • Curated opportunity research at signup

    GHNot offeredBothyYes (Pro + Premium tiers)
  • AI-drafted reports

    GHNoBothyComing Q3 2026 (Premium tier)
  • Mobile-friendly

    GHLimitedBothyYes — pilot dashboards mobile-tested
  • Number of customers using it

    GH~1,000+ (historical)Bothy42 pilot orgs · early SaaS access
  • Years in market

    GH10+ yearsBothyPilot 2026
  • Migration support from GrantHub

    GHN/ABothyFree data migration + setup fee waived
  • Multi-user with live presence

    GHMulti-user, no live presenceBothyMulti-user + real-time presence + per-action audit trail
  • Sign-in

    GHEmail + passwordBothyGoogle sign-in + magic-link fallback (no passwords to rotate)
  • Role-based access (owner/admin/editor/viewer)

    GHLimitedBothyYes — last-owner protection enforced at the database
  • Soft-delete + one-click restore

    GHNo — deleted is deletedBothyYes — restore any grant/task/report from the Activity tab
  • Public status page

    GHNoBothyYes — bothy.so/status (live DB probe)

Where GrantHub was honestly better

Tenure matters. GrantHub built up institutional knowledge in the segment over 10+ years, and a lot of nonprofits picked up workflows specifically shaped to its UI. If you have a team that knows GrantHub cold, the transition cost is real — even if the destination is better.

We're not going to pretend otherwise. Our pitch is: we'll absorb the migration cost (free data migration + setup fee waived), and we'll be patient while your team finds their new flow.

Where we think we're honestly better

GrantHub treated grant tracking as a pipeline problem. We treat it as a relationship problem. A grant is a moment in a multi-year relationship — and the workflow we built reflects that:

  • · Funder profile view aggregates every grant, task, report, and contact-log entry against one funder
  • · Stewardship tasks live alongside the grant, not in a separate tool
  • · Lapsed-funder alerts flag funded relationships you haven't touched in 90+ days
  • · Funder contact log records every email, call, meeting — past + future in one place

These are the features GrantHub users most often built workarounds for. We built them in.

If you also looked at Instrumentl

Instrumentl is what comes up most often in GrantHub-replacement searches. The short read:

  • · It has a much bigger funder discovery database (genuinely useful)
  • · It starts at $349/month — a 230% increase from GrantHub baseline
  • · It's built for larger orgs with dedicated grants managers and 20+ applications a year

If you have a dedicated grants manager and budget to match, Instrumentl is a real option. If you're a small-to-mid org running a leaner operation, we're built for you.

Full side-by-side: Bothy vs. Instrumentl →

Vendor-level market analysis: our research page or directly to The Grant Management Software Market in 2026 .

Our offer for GrantHub orphans

Show us a GrantHub invoice — any year.

  • Free data migration from a GrantHub CSV export
  • $1,500 Pro setup fee waived
  • First 60 days free on Solo or Pro
  • Match your prior GrantHub subscription length for the annual discount

We're still onboarding orphaned GrantHub customers months after the sunset. Drop your email and the data you have — we'll come back with a concrete plan.

Read more before deciding